Thursday, July 06, 2006

Fi yuo cna raed tihs,

yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too. Cna yuo raed tihs?Olny 55 % of plepoe can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a
wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be
in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed
it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I
awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Utterly readable, though it might hurt the head after half an hour or so. There was one of those e-mail things I got when at SSEES which was a simple experiment, asking you to count the number of fs in a sentence. Almost invariably, folk got the simple task wrong because they would always automatically overlook fs in little words, such as of.

1:11 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I once did an experiment for a psychology student on this very phenomenon. He had me look at many words and say how many I recognised. Just like then, every word of yours was recognisable.

1:17 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home